Inside killing
It’s not the first time I’ve posted about this movie… but this time I’ve actually watched it. (Finding a 2.5 hour chunk of time to commit turned out to be tough.) It was interestingly not as overtly shocking as I had expected. In fact, the parts I found the most disturbing were seeing Anwar, the main character, in moments of gentleness, with his grandsons or with some ducks. Seeing him show remorse was likewise subtly upsetting. I wanted him to be purely evil, easy to hate.
Other than the entire character of Herman, the other most-disturbing moment that comes to mind was when Anwar & Co. go on an Indonesian talk show. The hostess is bright, chipper, lauding them for their more-humane method of extermination. They’re joking, basking in the spotlight, if not heroes then too damn close to tell the difference.
Anwar, talking about a propaganda film that demonized Communists: “For me, that film is the one thing that makes me feel not guilty. I watch the film and feel reassured.”
Adi, a bit later on: “Killing is the worst crime you can do. So the key is to find a way not to feel guilty. It’s all about finding the right excuse.”
All over the world people are killing. In South Sudan, in Central African Republic, in Syria, in Iraq, in Palestine, in Ukraine, in Honduras and Mexico, and in this country, too… Recognizing the universal human capacity to adapt, to manage and integrate psychological dissonance, to create alternate versions of reality in order to justify ourselves makes it all a little easier to understand and at the same time even more terrifying.
An artistic postscript – fascinating to see film used reflectively – how by scripting and participating in the re-enactment of events, then viewing them, these men approached their personal and societal histories by a different route – and then to watch how the opportunities for reflection were either engaged or ignored.